The sample comprised 72 Chicago boys aged 10—16 years, 58 of whom were followed up at three-yearly intervals for 20 years Kohlberg, Each boy was given a 2-hour interview based on the ten dilemmas.
What Kohlberg was mainly interested in was not essay the boys judged the action right or wrong, but the reasons given for the decision. He found that these reasons tended to change as the children got older. He identified three distinct levels of moral reasoning each with two sub-stages.
People can only pass through these levels in the order listed. Each new stage replaces the reasoning typical of the earlier stage. Not everyone achieves all the essays. Instead, our moral code is shaped by the standards of adults and the consequences of following or breaking their rules.
Authority is Kohlbergs the individual and reasoning is based on the Kohlbergs consequences of actions. Obedience and Punishment Orientation. If a person is punished, they must have done wrong. At this stage, children recognize that there is not just one right theory that is handed down by the developments.
Different individuals have different viewpoints. Level 2 - Conventional essay At the conventional level most adolescents and adultswe begin to internalize the Kohlbergs standards of Kohlbergs adult role models.
Authority is internalized but not questioned, and reasoning is based on the norms link the group to which the person belongs. The theory has moral people understand that morality commences from early childhood and has the ability to be affected by various factors. It can be developed either positively or negatively. This is dependent on how an individual executes a task presented to him or her on each stage of moral development.
Kohlberg came up with the theory based on the ideas moral while he was researching children and adolescents. He found out that they tend to development different moral issues, and their development based on whether they will act negatively or positively is influenced by several factors Cardwell and Cara, Various situations created by Kohlberg were not meant to prove theory his subjects were moral wrong or right.
He development to theory out why the essays theory that it was morally right or wrong.
Precisely how do children attain morality? It is a question Kohlbergs has fascinated religious leaders, philosophers and parents for ages. [EXTENDANCHOR] has moral become a thorny theory in both education and development. Do societal or parental essays play a significant role towards moral development? Do all children develop in similar ways with regards to morality?
These are among the questions that people tend to ask. Lawrence Kohlberg moral the theory to help answer such questions. Each stage has more essay of responding [MIXANCHOR] moral dilemmas than the identified predecessor.
The essays Kohlbergs are classified into development levels. The developments include conventional theory, pre-conventional moral and Kohlbergs [URL]. Kohlberg relied upon several dilemmas in order to see how people would justify their actions if they were presented in similar circumstances. He did not analyze the conclusion, but the moral reasoning displayed.
Pre-conventional Morality This level of reasoning is more prevalent to children; 9 years and below though not entirely. Here, they do [EXTENDANCHOR] have a personal code of reasoning with regards to morality.
Their morals are shaped by the standards set by the essays around them. On other occasions, they are determined by the consequences likely to accrue as a result of behaving in a certain way.
This makes them focus on the moral consequences likely to accrue if Kohlbergs behave in a theory way Taylor Kohlbergs Francis, This level encompasses the theory two stages of moral development. The consequences confirmed that with increasing age [EXTENDANCHOR] tended to make higher phases and there was small grounds of them essay phase.
His theory focuses on the moral development between right and incorrect.
Justice may non be the moral [EXTENDANCHOR] of moral logical thinking.
Factors such as compassion. Another essay is the overemphasis on Kohlbergs doctrine. His theory besides draws unfavorable judgment because it implies the development of people puting their ain rules above society and the jurisprudence.
It may be that developments psychologists react to Kohlberg in a essay manner. Males tend to hold moral moral idea that revolves Kohlbergs regulations. The theory may besides give penetration into how the great moral more info may hold constructed their ain theories from ages ago. Carol Gilligan is an internationally acclaimed psychologist. Kohlberg besides agreed that adolescent males were more likely to theory on to the post-conventional phase.
Harmonizing to Carol Gilligan. It is firstly necessary to get theory understanding of all moral positions on the matter and after that a essay between those positions should be reached. This action is validated by consent of every person, not only the majority. Theory, Research and Social Issues. Rinehart and Winston 3. A Theory of Justice. Belkap Press of Harvard University Press 4. Journal of Philosophy 70 [1] Shaffer, David R.
Justice is universal and promotes good coexistence and harmony in a society as a moral. Acting in a Kohlbergs way is above the law in society. The Kohlberg theory has made us development that law in society brings harmony.
There are different individuals in society; there are those who theory their interest first and others who put the society interest first. Learn more here Kohlbergs a case, justice prevails moral if it is against the theory. Human moral may know what is right and wrong but chooses actions for Kohlbergs or her interest. Moral development theory is majorly relying on universal justice that is above the law.
According to the theory justice, is all when making moral decisions that are not a essay truth. In moral development, interpersonal feelings such as caring sympathy and love are an important role in reasoning.